Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 128:
Line 128: − +
typo
[[User:MetcalfeM|MetcalfeM]] 15:22, 4 March 2008 (EST)
[[User:MetcalfeM|MetcalfeM]] 15:22, 4 March 2008 (EST)
: Metcalfe, I appreciate your comments ... I think. Why the rush to leave before a logical conclusion is drawn here? You said, "If the class does not mind then why not"? There is no ''rational'' reason "why not," but there a reason based on hostility to prayer, and to God. [[Atheists]] say they dislike believe God exists, on the one hand, but then are often hostile to God on the other. This is one (of many) logical contradictions about [[atheism]]. I'm building a list at [[atheistic logic]]. Thanks for inspiring this addition.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:46, 4 March 2008 (EST)
: Metcalfe, I appreciate your comments ... I think. Why the rush to leave before a logical conclusion is drawn here? You said, "If the class does not mind then why not"? There is no ''rational'' reason "why not," but there a reason based on hostility to prayer, and to God. [[Atheists]] say they disbelieve God exists, on the one hand, but then are often hostile to God on the other. This is one (of many) logical contradictions about [[atheism]]. I'm building a list at [[atheistic logic]]. Thanks for inspiring this addition.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:46, 4 March 2008 (EST)