Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Backlash: - fix wiki link for second name
Line 20: Line 20:  
==Backlash==
 
==Backlash==
   −
Three of the scientists interviewed in the film claim that they were deceived as to the film's purpose and title, and one, [[Richard Dawkins]] said that he would not have agreed to participate in it had he known the stand that it was going to take, which he deceptively describes as "creationist".  The other two, [[Eugenie C. Scott]] and [[P.Z. Myers]], said that they would have appeared anyway.<ref name="nyt"/>
+
Three of the scientists interviewed in the film claim that they were deceived as to the film's purpose and title, and one, [[Richard Dawkins]] said that he would not have agreed to participate in it had he known the stand that it was going to take, which he deceptively describes as "creationist".  The other two, [[Eugenie C. Scott]] and [[Paul Zachary Myers|P.Z. Myers]], said that they would have appeared anyway.<ref name="nyt"/>
    
*Dawkins and others later complained that they hadn't been warned that the movie would be unsympathetic to their cause. In response, Ben Stein said that no one he interviewed asked what the film would be about, and the co-producer Walt Ruloff said at the preview that interviewees were paid and were even told ahead of time what the questions would be. [http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=12759]
 
*Dawkins and others later complained that they hadn't been warned that the movie would be unsympathetic to their cause. In response, Ben Stein said that no one he interviewed asked what the film would be about, and the co-producer Walt Ruloff said at the preview that interviewees were paid and were even told ahead of time what the questions would be. [http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=12759]
Block
1,976

edits

Navigation menu