37
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: +
no edit summary
:::The point is, when that certain someone who is pro-choice excercises that choice, a dead baby is the result each and every time. The baby has no choice, no right to choose, no right to live at all. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 23:17, 3 March 2008 (EST)
:::The point is, when that certain someone who is pro-choice excercises that choice, a dead baby is the result each and every time. The baby has no choice, no right to choose, no right to live at all. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 23:17, 3 March 2008 (EST)
::::Of course, liberals dispute that the life of the fetus begins at conception. This seems to be an intransigent point on both sides, as for one side it's religious, and for the other, it's scientific. I respect both positions (I myself am pro-choice) and I can't say that characterizing one's opposition pejoratively is a civil debate tactic.-[[User:PhoenixWright|PhoenixWright]] 23:24, 3 March 2008 (EST)
::::Of course, liberals dispute that the life of the fetus begins at conception. This seems to be an intransigent point on both sides, as for one side it's religious, and for the other, it's scientific. I respect both positions (I myself am pro-choice) and I can't say that characterizing one's opposition pejoratively is a civil debate tactic.-[[User:PhoenixWright|PhoenixWright]] 23:24, 3 March 2008 (EST)
:::::Ok, so we disagree, I understand. I would just like to know if it would be ok to reword the section regarding the "pro-abortion" statement. I find it offensive and not an appropriate way to prove your point.[[User:VonShroom|VonShroom]] 13:57, 5 March 2008 (EST)
== Remove statement? ==
== Remove statement? ==