nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + +
Debate:What is the relationship between religion and the human tendency to kill each other? (view source)
Revision as of 01:14, March 6, 2008
, 01:14, March 6, 2008→No Religion?: Not necessary tradition.
::: You can call humanism a religion because it is. Your definition of "religion" is a humanistic one. Try reading [[religion]]. Humanism includes the ''belief'' that there is no god. That is, humanism has beliefs also. And Christianity has very little if anything in the way of necessary traditions. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:57, 5 March 2008 (EST)
::: You can call humanism a religion because it is. Your definition of "religion" is a humanistic one. Try reading [[religion]]. Humanism includes the ''belief'' that there is no god. That is, humanism has beliefs also. And Christianity has very little if anything in the way of necessary traditions. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:57, 5 March 2008 (EST)
:::You go to church doesn't you? :)--[[User:Nabroon|Nabroon]] 09:14, 5 March 2008 (EST)
:::You go to church doesn't you? :)--[[User:Nabroon|Nabroon]] 09:14, 5 March 2008 (EST)
:::: I don't go to church out of tradition, and it's not strictly ''necessary'' to go to church to be a Christian. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:14, 5 March 2008 (EST)
Of course we would. Not all conflicts are really about religion. Oh, there may be some rhetoric about “God
Of course we would. Not all conflicts are really about religion. Oh, there may be some rhetoric about “God
being on our side” and all that, but most conflicts have been over territory, and the control of resources.
being on our side” and all that, but most conflicts have been over territory, and the control of resources.