nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
902
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 126:
Line 126: +
→Query: Philip, I think I understand your position. Is this correct?
:::::::::::* Claiming that replacing one religion with another is just as unfair is only valid if the religions themselves are equally valid. But replacing the false religion of humanism with the true religion of Christianity seems to me like a quite sensible move.
:::::::::::* Claiming that replacing one religion with another is just as unfair is only valid if the religions themselves are equally valid. But replacing the false religion of humanism with the true religion of Christianity seems to me like a quite sensible move.
::::::::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:13, 5 March 2008 (EST)
::::::::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:13, 5 March 2008 (EST)
::::::::::So because the government would be inevitably be endorsing a "religion" in any case, it should default to endorsing Christianity because that is the majority religion. Is that a fair understanding of your position? [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 22:35, 5 March 2008 (EST)
The creative attempts to justify classroom prayer are illogical and self-contradictory:
The creative attempts to justify classroom prayer are illogical and self-contradictory: