Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:  
Oh deary me. I cite the website itself with its message of "Force kids to watch our film and get money!" and you still revert my edit stating that the producers have been ACCUSED of attempted bribery. Tell me, Philip, what would be a better source than the website in question? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 21:40, 5 March 2008 (EST)
 
Oh deary me. I cite the website itself with its message of "Force kids to watch our film and get money!" and you still revert my edit stating that the producers have been ACCUSED of attempted bribery. Tell me, Philip, what would be a better source than the website in question? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 21:40, 5 March 2008 (EST)
 
:The problem is not (this time) with the choice of web-site, but with what it's claimed to be saying.  The site says nothing about bribing.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:37, 6 March 2008 (EST)
 
:The problem is not (this time) with the choice of web-site, but with what it's claimed to be saying.  The site says nothing about bribing.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:37, 6 March 2008 (EST)
 +
::Ah, yes. Encouraging mandatory field trips (Question 2.) and saying the schools can return the ticket stubs for donations '''certainly''' isn't bribery. Aside from that, I said that that's the site that was cited. How about I simply add that they've been accused with no source? Hmm? Would that appease you? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 10:10, 6 March 2008 (EST)
1,193

edits

Navigation menu