5,175
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 166:
Line 166: + + + + + +
categorize Swift-boating
:Yes, I received your email and sent you a reply. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 08:39, 5 March 2008 (EST)
:Yes, I received your email and sent you a reply. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 08:39, 5 March 2008 (EST)
== categorize Swift-boating ==
Would you please categorize your article? I disagree with the contents and so recuse myself from editing the article. For what it's worth, I think you can absolutely make the case that the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth did a service to the country (and the case is amply made in the appropriate article), but the usage of the term "Swift-boating" is probably close to 100% as a derrogatory term.
Again, I'm not debating the merits of the Vets for Truth movement, but I think you're on the wrong foot in the article. Before responding, please note that I've done absolutely nothing to the article itself. Thanks, [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 16:14, 6 March 2008 (EST)