nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: − +
How about this wording instead.
They never conclude that the life in the container arose spontaneously.
They never conclude that the life in the container arose spontaneously.
Despite this law, many scientists believe that the ''first'' life arose from non-living matter. In proposing this, they speculate that although life has never been observed to spontaneously arise, it must have at some time in the past. Being a unique past event, the speculation cannot be tested or refuted, thus remaining an article of [[blind faith]] for those who reject the idea that [[God]] created life.
Despite this law, many scientists believe that the ''first'' life arose from non-living matter. In proposing this, they speculate that although life has never been observed to spontaneously arise, it must have at some time in the past. Being a unique past event, the speculation cannot be tested or refuted, thus remaining an article of [[blind faith]] for those who reject the idea that life was created.
[[Creationism|Creationists]] believe that the first biological life did not come from non-life, but from the living God.
[[Creationism|Creationists]] believe that the first biological life did not come from non-life, but from the living God.