nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: +
→Revert: Better?
::::::It's simple...you may not respect me, as you stated on your talk page, but you will respect this website and our conservative/Judeo-Christian beliefs. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:12, 7 March 2008 (EST)
::::::It's simple...you may not respect me, as you stated on your talk page, but you will respect this website and our conservative/Judeo-Christian beliefs. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:12, 7 March 2008 (EST)
:::::::How is accounting for the beliefs of others disrespectful to your Judeo-Christian beliefs, let alone your conservative beliefs or this website? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 00:13, 7 March 2008 (EST)
:::::::How is accounting for the beliefs of others disrespectful to your Judeo-Christian beliefs, let alone your conservative beliefs or this website? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 00:13, 7 March 2008 (EST)
:::::::: I think that the problem in some ways is that most of the debate is between evolutionists and ''Christian'' creationists. And most of the little bit beyond Christians is with Jews and Muslims, both of which are "related" monotheistic religions. Barikada is technically correct in that atheists would reject life being created by ''any'' "god", but to my mind the question is how relevant those other "gods" are, given what I've just said about the debate. That is, I fully accept that atheists would not accept a Hindu creation account (at least if it ''does'' propose a creation, but I have my doubts about that anyway), but how many atheists do you see actually debating this with Hindus (or vice versa)? It's really a non-issue there. And the altered wording was a little awkward to make that irrelevant point. However, I've altered it in a different way that is more encompassing, without the awkwardness. All happy? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:45, 7 March 2008 (EST)