1,660
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 205:
Line 205: + +
→I'm back
:::: "PalMD", your claim of "being an expert in 'human medicine' certainly qualifies [you] better than anyone else at this site to comment" is a comical absurdity. No one is a general expert in "human medicine" and you're not fooling anyone here. I deal with physicians every day, including other physicians on this site, and I have never seen such an unjustified claim of expertise before. Don't pretend to be an expert beyond what you may know, and don't engage in [[liberal denial]] here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 07:55, 8 March 2008 (EST)
:::: "PalMD", your claim of "being an expert in 'human medicine' certainly qualifies [you] better than anyone else at this site to comment" is a comical absurdity. No one is a general expert in "human medicine" and you're not fooling anyone here. I deal with physicians every day, including other physicians on this site, and I have never seen such an unjustified claim of expertise before. Don't pretend to be an expert beyond what you may know, and don't engage in [[liberal denial]] here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 07:55, 8 March 2008 (EST)
I have to admit that what I love about this place is that you and Karajou feel free to display your ignorace for all to see. Despite your dealings with [[AAPS]], you are not a medical expert, and obviously know nothing about the field. What is your medical specialty that gives you all the breast cancer knowledge that an internist and medical professor misses? Ever read [http://scienceblogs.com/insolence|Orac]? He is an expert. Good stuff. My knowledge of the law is equally vague. I don't know a writ from a whit. You don't know an internist from an intern. Nothing wrong with that. But it's ok, your [[User:Karajou|enforcer]] will clean up your inconsistencies.[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 08:47, 8 March 2008 (EST)