1,558
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: + +
Talk:Politics of global warming (view source)
Revision as of 21:10, March 8, 2008
, 21:10, March 8, 2008no edit summary
:Can I make a quick point, in reference to the first line of the article, which implies that taking action against global warming is a bad thing? Even if global warming is largely down to natural causes, there is no plausible argument for ''not'' trying to prevent it. It doesn't make sense that taking no action could be better than taking any action at all.--[[User:Metatron|Metatron]] 10:13, 29 December 2007 (EST)
:Can I make a quick point, in reference to the first line of the article, which implies that taking action against global warming is a bad thing? Even if global warming is largely down to natural causes, there is no plausible argument for ''not'' trying to prevent it. It doesn't make sense that taking no action could be better than taking any action at all.--[[User:Metatron|Metatron]] 10:13, 29 December 2007 (EST)
:And where does this assertion come from, that the politics is "dominated" by the pro-AGW side? How is that measured? Not to mention the idea that they're "anti-American". This part needs an edit.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 16:10, 8 March 2008 (EST)