10
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 845:
Line 845: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 02:56, March 10, 2008
, 02:56, March 10, 2008Graph: Number of people claiming a faith = 2179; Number of atheists = 1508.
I'm removing this claim because the source is very flimsy. An inactive blog written by a self proclaimed "eccentric" isn't a powerful enough position to put such a quote in the banner. [[User:Qc|Qc]] 18:57, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
I'm removing this claim because the source is very flimsy. An inactive blog written by a self proclaimed "eccentric" isn't a powerful enough position to put such a quote in the banner. [[User:Qc|Qc]] 18:57, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
== Graph: Number of people claiming a faith = 2179; Number of atheists = 1508. ==
Is it just me, or are there more people of faith on wikipedia than atheists?
The graph shows that the number of people claiming a faith = 2179 whilst the number of atheists = 1508.
That's 60% believes, versus 40% disbelieves.
Is wikipedia in fact "<U>faithist</U>"?
It makes me wonder if we have any statistics regarding the number of atheists on Conserapedia versus the numbers from the faith groups?
I really hope that Conservapedia (unlike wikipedia) is not bias to any one faith group.
It would be a sorry day for "The Trustworthy Encyclopaedia" if it was dominated by any one faith group; would that be health, surely we wouldn’t want any one group’s view to dominate the others …
Well lets hope not ...