Changes

:::: Not true - this article is about how atheists bias wikipedia.  Thus, comparison with the group “Non-atheist” is not arbitrary selection at all.  It is the logical selection of the group of people on wikipedia who are not atheists i.e. the opposite group to the atheist group.  

:::: Not true - this article is about how atheists bias wikipedia.  Thus, comparison with the group “Non-atheist” is not arbitrary selection at all.  It is the logical selection of the group of people on wikipedia who are not atheists i.e. the opposite group to the atheist group.  

:::: I believe what you really dislike about my point is that christians have been lumped-in with the other faith groups! If this is your point then forget the atheist and focus on the “non-christians” on wikipedia as a group, then you can see the christian are sorely out-numbered and wikipedia and that wikipedia is blatantly anti-christian website (despite being the largest <s>faith</s> {non- atheists} group on it).  

:::: I believe what you really dislike about my point is that christians have been lumped-in with the other faith groups! If this is your point then forget the atheist and focus on the “non-christians” on wikipedia as a group, then you can see the christians are sorely out-numbered and that wikipedia is blatantly anti-christian website (despite being the largest <s>faith</s> {non- atheists} group on it).  

:::: Also, if you do not view the “other faith groups” as proper “faith groups” why are they even on your chart? Why not have “christians vs atheist” or  “christians vs non-christians” . Either of these would seem more logical based on your statements above. - [[User:Qgobo|Qgobo]] 00:33, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

:::: Also, if you do not view the “other faith groups” as proper “faith groups” why are they even on your chart? Why not have “christians vs atheist” or  “christians vs non-christians” . Either of these would seem more logical based on your statements above. - [[User:Qgobo|Qgobo]] 00:33, 10 March 2008 (EDT)