1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 16:06, March 10, 2008
, 16:06, March 10, 2008no edit summary
<!-- ===============Archive below this line! Do not remove anything above this line.=========================== -->
<!-- ===============Archive below this line! Do not remove anything above this line.=========================== -->
==Why some of these problems don't count==
Biases such as a lack of Biography on conservatives, here is the soltion. ADD THEM! An expert (presumably a conservative) has to write the article. There are more bios on Liberals because there are more people writing about them. Seperating to another website will not encourage what you believe to be true! It means that conservatives and Liberals stay wrong about things. Go and add the Bio, don't write it here!
Number 50. Dismisses the banner saying that an article doesn't represent a world view, and you argue that there is no world view. By your own admission, there is no one view that represents all people of the world. Due to this, it would be necessary to tell people when something is Western centric, or American Centric. An article on Gun law, for example, could not be reliable from an American view because (unlike many countries) guns are supported in the constitution. 50 isa contradiction.
== possible bias ==
== possible bias ==