Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 37: Line 37:     
: This uses the same faulty circular reasoning the decay-based approaches.  You're assuming something about aging to prove aging.  It's like using a political poll today to predict the outcome of an election in a few months.  For obvious reasons, that approach is often wrong.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:43, 8 March 2008 (EST)
 
: This uses the same faulty circular reasoning the decay-based approaches.  You're assuming something about aging to prove aging.  It's like using a political poll today to predict the outcome of an election in a few months.  For obvious reasons, that approach is often wrong.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:43, 8 March 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
I'm sorry, but the reasons aren't obvious.  What am I assuming?--[[User:Phillipps|Phillipps]] 17:25, 10 March 2008 (EDT)
155

edits

Navigation menu