Changes

I edited several wikipedian user templates so that templates identifying one with religion a or atheism etc. will result in you being put in that category for example several atheist wikipedian user templates now put the user in the category Category:Atheist Wikipedians, if he/she puts the template on their userpage, revealing our current estimated amount of atheist/ and others is greatly underestimated there is 1722 atheist Wikipedians of which 17 are objectivist. Also we forgot agnostics there is 515 of them numbering about as much as the christian sample of wikipedia alone. There should be a part on the picture where it reveals the sample size. that means there is 2222 atheist or agnostics out of our sample wow! Way more than the sample for christians  Please update the picture showing religious affiliation of Wikipedians--[[User:Java7837|Java7837]] 16:22, 28 February 2008 (EST)

I edited several wikipedian user templates so that templates identifying one with religion a or atheism etc. will result in you being put in that category for example several atheist wikipedian user templates now put the user in the category Category:Atheist Wikipedians, if he/she puts the template on their userpage, revealing our current estimated amount of atheist/ and others is greatly underestimated there is 1722 atheist Wikipedians of which 17 are objectivist. Also we forgot agnostics there is 515 of them numbering about as much as the christian sample of wikipedia alone. There should be a part on the picture where it reveals the sample size. that means there is 2222 atheist or agnostics out of our sample wow! Way more than the sample for christians  Please update the picture showing religious affiliation of Wikipedians--[[User:Java7837|Java7837]] 16:22, 28 February 2008 (EST)

:Actually, I'd like to know where that graph came from in the first place.  It was put there by [[user:Wahrheit|Wahrheit]], but I've not seen any explanation of where the figures came from.  Unless Wahrheit can explain that, I think the graph should be removed as possibly bogus.  And by the way, the graph ''does'' include agnostics, and how does 515 <s>outnumber</s> mean "about as much as" 789, the figure shown for Christians?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:32, 28 February 2008 (EST)

:Actually, I'd like to know where that graph came from in the first place.  It was put there by [[user:Wahrheit|Wahrheit]], but I've not seen any explanation of where the figures came from.  Unless Wahrheit can explain that, I think the graph should be removed as possibly bogus.  And by the way, the graph ''does'' include agnostics, and how does 515 <s>outnumber</s> mean "about as much as" 789, the figure shown for Christians?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:32, 28 February 2008 (EST)

::As there has been no explanation of the origin or basis of that graph, I will remove it as suggested above.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:25, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

::As there has been no explanation of the origin or basis of that graph, I will remove it as I suggested above.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:25, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

== "Wikipedia has been called the National Enquirer of the Internet:[1]" ==

== "Wikipedia has been called the National Enquirer of the Internet:[1]" ==