Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 83: Line 83:  
:I fully agree.  By that logic, [[User:Conservative]] needs to stay OUT of the [[Theory of Evolution]] article. --[[User:Scrap|Scrap]] 20:43, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:I fully agree.  By that logic, [[User:Conservative]] needs to stay OUT of the [[Theory of Evolution]] article. --[[User:Scrap|Scrap]] 20:43, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
    +
==*waves a hand*==
 +
could one of the editors go smack whoever defaced [[conservapedia:Women in the Military?|Women in the Military?]] please? Thanks. [[User:Navy Nuke|Navy Nuke]] 20:51, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
    
----
 
----
Line 101: Line 103:  
:::::I agree with AmesG.  While this is a conservative encyclopedia, there are many conservatives who are evolutionists.  I am personally an Old Earth creationist, but I don't believe that the other side's view should be censored, especially when many of my respected conservative friends' beliefs clash directly with mine. --[[User:Splark|Splark]] 02:16, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::I agree with AmesG.  While this is a conservative encyclopedia, there are many conservatives who are evolutionists.  I am personally an Old Earth creationist, but I don't believe that the other side's view should be censored, especially when many of my respected conservative friends' beliefs clash directly with mine. --[[User:Splark|Splark]] 02:16, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::: Note that AmeG has now been blocked by Conservative. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 16:41, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::: Note that AmeG has now been blocked by Conservative. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 16:41, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
  −
==*waves a hand*==
  −
could one of the editors go smack whoever defaced [[conservapedia:Women in the Military?|Women in the Military?]] please? Thanks. [[User:Navy Nuke|Navy Nuke]] 20:51, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
 
54

edits

Navigation menu