Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
743 bytes added ,  15:53, March 11, 2008
→‎Is the Bible wrong about pi?: No, and I don't think the Koran is either
Line 82: Line 82:  
:::Anyway, you're being too patient with a time-waster. Liberals l-o-v-e to change the subject, with distractions like the supposedly preferable spelling of sceptic. I'm sceptical of this fella's motives, and I've left a note at his talk page. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:13, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:::Anyway, you're being too patient with a time-waster. Liberals l-o-v-e to change the subject, with distractions like the supposedly preferable spelling of sceptic. I'm sceptical of this fella's motives, and I've left a note at his talk page. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:13, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:::: I would actually like him to answer my last question above, though.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:43, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:::: I would actually like him to answer my last question above, though.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:43, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
The Bible does not provide a value for pi, so the following statement is misleading at best:
 +
 +
:The [[Qur'an]] also defines Pi as 3.(al-Sûra ''aleph bei'').
 +
 +
Use of the word "also" implies that the Bible has provided a definition. The story about the ten cubits does not define pi. It merely gives a diameter and a radius of something presumed to be circular. (A circumference of thirty is consistent with a diameter of ten, with a precision of one [[significant digit]].)
 +
 +
In any case, I'd like to see the exact words of an English translation of any Koran passage related to circle math before approving any claim as damaging as "defines Pi as 3." --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:53, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu