333
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + +
Talk:Air temperature and carbon dioxide (view source)
Revision as of 18:30, March 11, 2008
, 18:30, March 11, 2008no edit summary
:Please help my be writing everything you know about the correlation between temperature and CO2, particularly if it sheds any light on one causing changes in the other. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:24, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
:Please help my be writing everything you know about the correlation between temperature and CO2, particularly if it sheds any light on one causing changes in the other. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:24, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
I agree with DrSandstone. Why not merge this minutia with [[AGW hypothesis]], or [[Anthropogenic global warming]], or [[Runaway greenhouse effect]] or [[Greenhouse effect]], or [[Greenhouse gas]], or [[Science of global warming]]... And I'm sure there are more. Many more, I fear! There seems to be a sudden proliferation of these pages, all looking more like soapboxes than encyclopedia articles. Conservapedia is either an encyclopedia that aims to tell the truth in a trustworthy manner, or it is a medium for pushing a particular point of view on various political, social and scientific issues. Either way, I cannot see how this plethora of overlapping articles helps. What are you trying to achieve? [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 14:30, 11 March 2008 (EDT)