203
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 189:
Line 189: + +
Talk:Left Behind: Eternal Forces (view source)
Revision as of 19:55, March 11, 2008
, 19:55, March 11, 2008→Complaints vs. patches
::::Do a Google search for 'fully patched'. You'll get hits like [http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=254 this], [http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2005/12/new-exploit-blows-by-fully-patched.html this], [http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2004/06/09/new_attack_compromises_fullypatched_ie_browsers.html this], [http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/06/05/0046258 this], [http://securitywatch.eweek.com/microsoft_windows/driveby_exploit_plants_trojans_on_fully_patched_iewindows_systems.html this], [http://www.geek.com/fully-patched-firefox-browser-has-extensions-vulnerability/ this], [http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/6230 this], [http://www.2-spyware.com/news/post243.html this], [http://digg.com/tech_news/New_exploit_blows_by_fully_patched_Windows_XP_systems this] and [http://virtualization.sys-con.com/read/166894.htm this]. That's just a few samples from the first 2 or 3 pages that most effectively prove my point - which is that you are utterly and completely wrong. 'Fully patched' does not mean 'no issues left', it means 'all patches so far applied'. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 15:46, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
::::Do a Google search for 'fully patched'. You'll get hits like [http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=254 this], [http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2005/12/new-exploit-blows-by-fully-patched.html this], [http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2004/06/09/new_attack_compromises_fullypatched_ie_browsers.html this], [http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/06/05/0046258 this], [http://securitywatch.eweek.com/microsoft_windows/driveby_exploit_plants_trojans_on_fully_patched_iewindows_systems.html this], [http://www.geek.com/fully-patched-firefox-browser-has-extensions-vulnerability/ this], [http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/6230 this], [http://www.2-spyware.com/news/post243.html this], [http://digg.com/tech_news/New_exploit_blows_by_fully_patched_Windows_XP_systems this] and [http://virtualization.sys-con.com/read/166894.htm this]. That's just a few samples from the first 2 or 3 pages that most effectively prove my point - which is that you are utterly and completely wrong. 'Fully patched' does not mean 'no issues left', it means 'all patches so far applied'. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 15:46, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
::::I've done a compromise (again) - I've kept your edit, but altered it to be accurate, in light of the above, and moved your source to a more appropriate place. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 15:55, 11 March 2008 (EDT)