Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
330 bytes added ,  03:44, March 12, 2008
Line 74: Line 74:  
::Well, if it's ten cubits from one side to the other, it should be 31 all around, if we're rounding. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 21:13, 10 March 2008 (EDT)
 
::Well, if it's ten cubits from one side to the other, it should be 31 all around, if we're rounding. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 21:13, 10 March 2008 (EDT)
 
::: What if it was actually 9.7 cubits (rounded to 10) from one side to the other?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:12, 10 March 2008 (EDT)
 
::: What if it was actually 9.7 cubits (rounded to 10) from one side to the other?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:12, 10 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
:::: Then the measurement given is, quite simply, wrong. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 23:44, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
    
:::I took a few science courses in high school and college. You might be interested to learn about the difference between "[[accuracy]]" and "[[precision]]". (I probably should compare and contrast the two ideas in a proposed new article: [[accuracy and precision]].)  
 
:::I took a few science courses in high school and college. You might be interested to learn about the difference between "[[accuracy]]" and "[[precision]]". (I probably should compare and contrast the two ideas in a proposed new article: [[accuracy and precision]].)  
Line 85: Line 87:  
:::Anyway, you're being too patient with a time-waster. Liberals l-o-v-e to change the subject, with distractions like the supposedly preferable spelling of sceptic. I'm sceptical of this fella's motives, and I've left a note at his talk page. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:13, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:::Anyway, you're being too patient with a time-waster. Liberals l-o-v-e to change the subject, with distractions like the supposedly preferable spelling of sceptic. I'm sceptical of this fella's motives, and I've left a note at his talk page. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:13, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:::: I would actually like him to answer my last question above, though.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:43, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:::: I would actually like him to answer my last question above, though.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:43, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
:::::Ed: You'll get a response in the appropriate place momentarily, don't worry.
 +
:::::Philip J. Rayment: So you have wished it, so it shall be. Response is above. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 23:44, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
    
The Bible does not provide a value for pi, so the following statement is misleading at best:
 
The Bible does not provide a value for pi, so the following statement is misleading at best:
1,193

edits

Navigation menu