Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + + + + + + +
considered unorthodox
This interpretation assumes that "sons of God" refers to [[angel]]s, while "daughters of men" refers to human females.
This interpretation assumes that "sons of God" refers to [[angel]]s, while "daughters of men" refers to human females.
The Unification Church cites Jude 1:6-7 as evidence that angels "sinned" via "fornication":
*And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
*Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to [[fornication]], and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. ([http://kingjbible.com/jude/1.htm King James Version])
These views are considered unorthodox within mainstream Christian thought.