Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 31: Line 31:     
: We welcome well-supported facts here.  We don't censor alternative views.  But an entry is going to give credit to conservatives or Christianity or American where credit is due.  If you want to insert a liberal view that attempts to deny credit to Reagan for the fall of communism, then it should be well-supported and near the end, after the credit is fully given.  It can't be inserted in a manner suggesting that the issue is unresolved, or that we have no way of knowing whether Reagan deserves credit.  He obviously does.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:18, 10 March 2007 (EST)
 
: We welcome well-supported facts here.  We don't censor alternative views.  But an entry is going to give credit to conservatives or Christianity or American where credit is due.  If you want to insert a liberal view that attempts to deny credit to Reagan for the fall of communism, then it should be well-supported and near the end, after the credit is fully given.  It can't be inserted in a manner suggesting that the issue is unresolved, or that we have no way of knowing whether Reagan deserves credit.  He obviously does.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:18, 10 March 2007 (EST)
 +
::So what you're saying is that you don't censor alternative views, as long as they acknowledge that you're right? [[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 23:24, 12 March 2008 (EDT)
    
==Rekjavik, the Freeze, and the fall of Communism==
 
==Rekjavik, the Freeze, and the fall of Communism==
216

edits

Navigation menu