nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 49:
Line 49: +
→Scientists before Christ: What's the problem and what bias?
::: Why do you consider it unimpressive? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:31, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
::: Why do you consider it unimpressive? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:31, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
::::A quote does not the truth make. Argument ought not be throwing sources at one another all day. Further it's from a biased source. Anyways, I have to go, but keep that in mind.-[[User:PhoenixWright|PhoenixWright]] 09:37, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
::::A quote does not the truth make. Argument ought not be throwing sources at one another all day. Further it's from a biased source. Anyways, I have to go, but keep that in mind.-[[User:PhoenixWright|PhoenixWright]] 09:37, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
::::: No, a quote does not make the truth, but research can, in principle, establish the truth, and that is what Stark did. So what's the problem? And how is the source biased? And what sources would be unbiased? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:47, 13 March 2008 (EDT)