142
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: +
no edit summary
It's still a visual representation of the human form. How, in all honesty, do you think this photo is offensive? This is an illustration of a diagnostic technique. How does that warrant offensiveness? I am just trying to understand where you are coming from here...
It's still a visual representation of the human form. How, in all honesty, do you think this photo is offensive? This is an illustration of a diagnostic technique. How does that warrant offensiveness? I am just trying to understand where you are coming from here...
:Would you not find it inappropriate for such a picture to be hanging on the wall of a kindergarten or elementary school class? If so, why would we tolerate it here? --[[User:BillOReillyFan|BillOReillyFan]] 22:28, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
:Would you not find it inappropriate for such a picture to be hanging on the wall of a kindergarten or elementary school class? If so, why would we tolerate it here? --[[User:BillOReillyFan|BillOReillyFan]] 22:28, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
::Is this site really for kindergarteners? [[User:JamesK|JamesK]] 22:34, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
No, actually. I do not find a photo of the human form offensive for children. For heaven's sake, about 50% of children are brestfed in infancy. Once a child reaches the age of 5, how do breasts suddenly become offensive. Furthermore, many young women do not know how to perform a correct breast exam. In my experience, photographs are extremely helpful in this arena.
No, actually. I do not find a photo of the human form offensive for children. For heaven's sake, about 50% of children are brestfed in infancy. Once a child reaches the age of 5, how do breasts suddenly become offensive. Furthermore, many young women do not know how to perform a correct breast exam. In my experience, photographs are extremely helpful in this arena.