Changes

::<sigh>  Well, your very first sentence there shows us exactly who is the one pushing their agenda.  The only "agreement" or "compromise" that you want is the one that favors your biased view.  I've actually provided a reference that says the game is fully patched.  Your "only some of the issues were addressed" is based on... what?  Your say-so and nothing more.  Hrm...  Reference vs. your say-so.  Which is more trustworthy?  And the article is hardly "slightly biased in the game's favour."  It has presented both sides from the beginning.  Oh, and I like your oh-so humble "It's less biased now that ''I'' started editing it!  Dun-da-da-DA!" bit.  Give me a flipping break!  [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 11:44, 14 March 2008 (EDT)

::<sigh>  Well, your very first sentence there shows us exactly who is the one pushing their agenda.  The only "agreement" or "compromise" that you want is the one that favors your biased view.  I've actually provided a reference that says the game is fully patched.  Your "only some of the issues were addressed" is based on... what?  Your say-so and nothing more.  Hrm...  Reference vs. your say-so.  Which is more trustworthy?  And the article is hardly "slightly biased in the game's favour."  It has presented both sides from the beginning.  Oh, and I like your oh-so humble "It's less biased now that ''I'' started editing it!  Dun-da-da-DA!" bit.  Give me a flipping break!  [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 11:44, 14 March 2008 (EDT)

::Oh, by the way, this is CONSERVApedia, not WIKIpedia, so get used to the articles having bias against your point of view. Either that or leave. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 11:49, 14 March 2008 (EDT)

::Oh, by the way, this is CONSERVApedia, not WIKIpedia, so get used to the articles having bias against your point of view. Either that or leave. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 11:49, 14 March 2008 (EDT)