10
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + +
→Necesary?
== Necesary? ==
== Necesary? ==
I'm somewhat worried that the part about homosexuality will be misconstrued by certain people as an arbitrary opinion added post facto to force some sort of "agenda," and thus it will invite trolling and vandalization. As it really does not add or detract from the concept of "Intolerance" one way or the other, I propose removing it, so as to not dangle such a morsel in front of the frothy mouths of slathering trolls... [[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 16:17, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
I'm somewhat worried that the part about homosexuality will be misconstrued by certain people as an arbitrary opinion added post facto to force some sort of "agenda," and thus it will invite trolling and vandalization. As it really does not add or detract from the concept of "Intolerance" one way or the other, I propose removing it, so as to not dangle such a morsel in front of the frothy mouths of slathering trolls... [[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 16:17, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
Yes i think that the idea of a intolerance article is rather ironic considering this website is intolerant, please dont try to argue this one, because you can't, you are intolerant. So i agree with the above text, that we should delete it, so that stupid liberals won't voice their opinions and so that we don't all become evil gay people, because then we wouldn't have overpopulation and stuff, so....