31
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + + + + + + + + + +
Debate:Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism? (view source)
Revision as of 18:30, March 16, 2008
, 18:30, March 16, 2008no edit summary
I would suggest that whoever thought up this topic explain exactly what is meant here. The two are almost completely unrelated to one another(Other than the idea of change). So, really, what is being got at here?
I would suggest that whoever thought up this topic explain exactly what is meant here. The two are almost completely unrelated to one another(Other than the idea of change). So, really, what is being got at here?
==No it's not exactly compatible==
Marxism in the form of socialism/communism, and stresses social equality. Those who are at the top of society has to contribute their share of the wealth in order to balance out those at the bottom of society. Planned economies, etc are ways to "equalize" everyone. Economic socialism was also something on the lines of what Jesus taught.
Darwin's natural selection is actually more like capitalism. You work to accomplish individualistic goals in self interest. When everyone pursues self interest, the result is society actually benefits as a whole.
[[User:Intranetusa|Intranetusa]] 14:30, 16 March 2008 (EDT)
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]