6,786
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + +
Debate:Is Conservapedia blinkered? (view source)
Revision as of 12:41, March 17, 2008
, 12:41, March 17, 2008no edit summary
In my opinion, simply ignoring a topic that you dislike is a blinkered attitude. Pretending that something doesn't exist is not going to make it go away. [[User:Harebrained|Harebrained]] 08:23, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
In my opinion, simply ignoring a topic that you dislike is a blinkered attitude. Pretending that something doesn't exist is not going to make it go away. [[User:Harebrained|Harebrained]] 08:23, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
:Not devoting webpages to a subject is not a case of pretending a subject does not exist. As your ilk are so eager to point out, if somebody wants to know about a subject, they are only a couple of clicks away on the internet. We ''choose'' not to have pages about them. As for "protecting" children - what is wrong with that? The alternative is the unecessarily early sexualization of children, which many liberals and homosexuals seem happy to push. Why do ''you'' think a child should be educated about fellatio? [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 08:41, 17 March 2008 (EDT)