333
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 3:
Line 3: − +
→A bit rich...: sp
== A bit rich... ==
== A bit rich... ==
On a website which seems increasingly to pride itself on liberal use of the word "liberal" as a catch-all slur to disparage and discredit any views opposing evalengical christianity/creationism/conservatism, it seems just a wee bit rich to include an article suggesting that ''Liberals use words like "conservative" as epithets to disparage and discredit any views opposing Liberalism''. Pot, meet kettle! Or is this another parody article? It is becoming increasingly hard to tell the difference, and I fear for the wellbeing of this "trustworthy" encycclopedia. [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 11:09, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
On a website which seems increasingly to pride itself on liberal use of the word "liberal" as a catch-all slur to disparage and discredit any views opposing evangelical christianity/creationism/conservatism, it seems just a wee bit rich to include an article suggesting that ''Liberals use words like "conservative" as epithets to disparage and discredit any views opposing Liberalism''. Pot, meet kettle! Or is this another parody article? It is becoming increasingly hard to tell the difference, and I fear for the wellbeing of this "trustworthy" encycclopedia. [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 11:09, 17 March 2008 (EDT)