Block
1,976
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 256:
Line 256: + +
Talk:Left Behind: Eternal Forces (view source)
Revision as of 21:40, March 17, 2008
, 21:40, March 17, 2008→Edit war
I agree gentlemen that this seems silly. You both could be using the effort that you put towards this small difference to instead be creating constructive edits across Conservapedia. I really wish you would help us by looking at the bigger picture. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 17:18, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
I agree gentlemen that this seems silly. You both could be using the effort that you put towards this small difference to instead be creating constructive edits across Conservapedia. I really wish you would help us by looking at the bigger picture. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 17:18, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
The issue is about what "fully patched" (from the second paragraph of [http://www.ccgr.org/computer/left-behind-tribulation-forces.html this reference]) means in regards to the game. I have taken the plain, straight-forward English position (which the vast majority of average readers will understand) that "fully patched" means "fully patched" while Urushie apparently thinks (and I've never seen him say otherwise) that "fully patched" means "not fully patched." He has tried to argue that since hackers created a security breach in a fully patched version of Windows that means that "fully patched" doesn't mean "fully patched" in all instances, and ignoring the painfully obvious and insurmountable difference between people deliberately hacking Windows to create problems and a game which people aren't trying to hack into. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 17:40, 17 March 2008 (EDT)