nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 270:
Line 270: + +
Talk:Left Behind: Eternal Forces (view source)
Revision as of 06:29, March 18, 2008
, 06:29, March 18, 2008→Edit war
::In short, it's a very minor point in the article, which is why I have zero objections to it being removed entirely. I have been trying to bring some balance to the 'Reviews' section (as, in it's original form, it seemed to imply that all the negative reviews were down to 'religious bias'), and Jinx has been very grudgingly giving ground when he's been more or less forced to. For some reason, though, he has dug his heels firmly in, and refuses to budge on this, and wants to claim that there are no issues or complaints raised by the reviews that haven't been patched, despite simply looking at the reviews referenced within the article and comparing that with the list of fixes in the patchnotes (also referenced within the article) indicates this is simply not the case. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 20:52, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
::In short, it's a very minor point in the article, which is why I have zero objections to it being removed entirely. I have been trying to bring some balance to the 'Reviews' section (as, in it's original form, it seemed to imply that all the negative reviews were down to 'religious bias'), and Jinx has been very grudgingly giving ground when he's been more or less forced to. For some reason, though, he has dug his heels firmly in, and refuses to budge on this, and wants to claim that there are no issues or complaints raised by the reviews that haven't been patched, despite simply looking at the reviews referenced within the article and comparing that with the list of fixes in the patchnotes (also referenced within the article) indicates this is simply not the case. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 20:52, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
:::I don't think either helpjazz or myself wants to imply that we taking sides in your discussion in such a way as to denigrate either of you. You both have strong passions and feel strongly about certain aspects of how the article should be presented. Both of you can be valued contributors to the site and we hope both of you will be in the future. Any solution we reach here is not meant to be a 'right' or 'wrong' solution, but rather one that incorporates all of the information that both of you have given in such a form that the article is fair and upholds Conservapedia standards. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 02:29, 18 March 2008 (EDT)