767
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 396:
Line 396: + +
Talk:Dungeons and Dragons (view source)
Revision as of 10:47, March 18, 2008
, 10:47, March 18, 2008→Is the game really about "free will?"
::::::Actually, I go back to the AD&D first edition, which I think was superior to what was produced afterwards precisely because there was a strongly defined good and evil. Demons and devils were evil and sought the active destructive and torment of humans. So what happened with the 2nd edition? They were renamed and now they fought against each other instead. It sounded like PC garbage and neutered the game. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 02:36, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
::::::Actually, I go back to the AD&D first edition, which I think was superior to what was produced afterwards precisely because there was a strongly defined good and evil. Demons and devils were evil and sought the active destructive and torment of humans. So what happened with the 2nd edition? They were renamed and now they fought against each other instead. It sounded like PC garbage and neutered the game. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 02:36, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
:::::::Third Edition is a PC abomination where it seems clear that "neutral" is the preferred alignment. While the "kooky goods" are really no better than "evil", the peace-loving neutrals are not bound to any dogma. Also, before PC it was common practice to use "he" when one means "he/she". Third edition uses "she" instead. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 06:47, 18 March 2008 (EDT)