Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + − + − It is a plausible and consistent explanation for observable [[phenomena]].
rearrange
A '''scientific theory''' is more substantial than a conjecture or [[hypothesis]], but may not be verified as consistent with [[empirical]] data. <ref>For example, scientists may refer to phlogiston theory or ether theory, even though empirical verification was lacking.</ref>
A '''scientific theory''' is a plausible and consistent explanation for observable [[phenomena]].
It is more substantial than a conjecture or [[hypothesis]], but may not be verified as consistent with [[empirical]] data. <ref>For example, scientists may refer to phlogiston theory or ether theory, even though empirical verification was lacking.</ref>
To be considered [[science|scientific]], a theory must be [[falsifiable]].
To be considered [[science|scientific]], a theory must be [[falsifiable]].