Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2 bytes added ,  16:40, March 18, 2008
edit
Line 2: Line 2:  
Temp moved here, but really should be incorporated as a section on the use of art as propaganda , or in a propaganda article. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 13:06, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
 
Temp moved here, but really should be incorporated as a section on the use of art as propaganda , or in a propaganda article. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 13:06, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:I'll make the same protests I made before it was moved. The section is in poor form for an encyclopedia. There's no attribution for the opinion, and no citations for the facts. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:05, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:I'll make the same protests I made before it was moved. The section is in poor form for an encyclopedia. There's no attribution for the opinion, and no citations for the facts. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:05, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
−
::As usual I'll try to point out the obvious. <Sigh> ALL art is to bring across the artists message. The great religious painters were inspired by their faith (and I don't care what [[Dan Brown]] says). ''hoping to gain '''extra protection''' for their political speech
+
::As usual I'll try to point out the obvious. <Sigh> ALL art is to bring across the artists message. The great religious painters were inspired by their faith (and I don't care what [[Dan Brown]] says).  
−
:: Just asking, but extra protection from what? Public outrage? Claiming it's art rarely overrides others personal tastes. The Law? [[First Amendment]] covers all revolting things, '''as it well should.''' (I once heard an intresting thought: Free speech is for <expletive>, nice people usually don't need it's protection)
+
::''hoping to gain '''extra protection''' for their political speech'' Just asking, but extra protection from what? Public outrage? Claiming it's art rarely overrides others personal tastes. The Law? [[First Amendment]] covers all revolting things, '''as it well should.''' (I once heard an intresting thought: Free speech is for <expletive>, nice people usually don't need it's protection)
 
::Were you maybe trying to hint at NEA grants? If so please be more clear. (BTW, I also think the NEA shouldn't give money to these hacks). [[User:DLerner|ד.לערנער]] 10:45, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
 
::Were you maybe trying to hint at NEA grants? If so please be more clear. (BTW, I also think the NEA shouldn't give money to these hacks). [[User:DLerner|ד.לערנער]] 10:45, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
833

edits

Navigation menu