28
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 28:
Line 28: + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Commandments (view source)
Revision as of 18:05, March 18, 2008
, 18:05, March 18, 2008→Please expand on the meaning of "verifiable"
: This is not an official response; just my opinion. Others might see things differently.
: This is not an official response; just my opinion. Others might see things differently.
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:38, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:38, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
::"It is therefore unreasonable to say that God's existence cannot be proved. God's existence indeed can be proved, depending on what evidence it takes to convince one. "
::This quote from your article illustrates my point exactly. Conservapedia needs to set a standard for what constitutes valid "convincing" because every user is going to have their own personal threshold for accepting evidence. Saying evidence must be "verifiable" isn't enough because most editors don't even have an agreed upon definition of this term. [[User:Qc|Qc]] 14:05, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
== Two questions ==
== Two questions ==