19
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 89:
Line 89: +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 21:36, March 18, 2008
, 21:36, March 18, 2008→Reversion
:::: You deleted an accurate quotation of an observation that is substantially true. In the Al-Qaeda entry on Wikipedia that you cite as a counter-example, Wikipedia uses the term "militant" repeatedly to describe the organization and only uses the term "terrorist" in the context of official government descriptions of the organization.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:54, 16 March 2008 (EDT)
:::: You deleted an accurate quotation of an observation that is substantially true. In the Al-Qaeda entry on Wikipedia that you cite as a counter-example, Wikipedia uses the term "militant" repeatedly to describe the organization and only uses the term "terrorist" in the context of official government descriptions of the organization.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:54, 16 March 2008 (EDT)
::::Respectfully, the first sentence of wikipedia's article is ''"Al Qaeda is an international alliance of Islamic militant terrorist organizations founded in 1988."'' It goes on to list the nations that consider it a terrorist organization in the second paragraph of the article, then describes each of its "terrorist" attacks. We can sufficiently point out Wikipedia's obvious bias without using false information that makes us sound like hypocrites. We need to hold the highest standard. [[User:Deweyman|Deweyman]] 17:36, 18 March 2008 (EDT)