| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| − | 1. To act in self-defense (personal, family, innocents, nation).
| + | #To act in self-defense (personal, family, innocents, nation). |
| − | | + | #To own and carry weapons for self-defense and for ensuring that the nation remains free. |
| − | 2. To own and carry weapons for self-defense and for ensuring that the nation remains free.
| + | #To own and control private property (land, money, personal items, intellectual property, etc.) |
| − | | + | #To earn a living and keep the fruit of one’s labor. |
| − | 3. To own and control private property (land, money, personal items, intellectual property, etc.)
| + | #To [[worship]] -- or not worship -- [[God]] in the manner one chooses. |
| − | | + | #To associate with -- or disassociate from -- any person or group. |
| − | 4. To earn a living and keep the fruit of one’s labor.
| + | #To express any idea through print, voice, banner, or other media. |
| − | | + | #To be secure in one’s [[home]], papers, and person against unwarranted searches and seizures (privacy). |
| − | 5. To [[worship]] -- or not worship -- [[God]] in the manner one chooses.
| + | #To be advised of the charges, in the event of arrest. |
| − | | + | #To have a judge determine if the accused should be held for trial or for punishment. |
| − | 6. To associate with -- or disassociate from -- any person or group.
| + | #To be tried by a [[jury]] of one’s peers and face one’s accuser, in the event of being charged with a [[crime]]. |
| − | | + | #To be tried by a [[jury]] of one’s peers, in the event of a suit in which the disputed amount is substantive. |
| − | 7. To express any idea through print, voice, banner, or other media.
| + | #To suffer no cruel or unusual punishment, if found guilty of a crime. |
| − | | + | #To establish, monitor, control, and petition a “servant government” to help secure the above rights. |
| − | 8. To be secure in one’s [[home]], papers, and person against warrantless searches and seizures (privacy).
| + | #To abolish said [[government]], when it becomes destructive of these rights. |
| − | | |
| − | 9. To be advised of the charges, in the event of arrest.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 10. To have a judge determine if the accused should be held for trial or for punishment.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 11. To be tried by a [[jury]] of one’s peers and face one’s accuser, in the event of being charged with a [[crime]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | 12. To be tried by a [[jury]] of one’s peers, in the event of a suit in which the disputed amount is substantive.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 13. To suffer no cruel or unusual punishment, if found guilty of a crime.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 14. To establish, monitor, control, and petition a “servant government” to help secure the above rights.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 15. To abolish said [[government]], when it becomes destructive of these rights.
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | == Early History in America == | | == Early History in America == |
| − |
| |
| | | | |
| | The concept of unalienable rights in America extends as far back as 1620, when the first Pilgrims arrived on the shores of what is now [[Massachusetts]], in search of religious freedom. According to Governor William Bradford, it was the unending attack on the rights of religious minorities in [[Britain]] which convinced the [[Pilgrims]] that leaving [[England]] was the only way to secure their liberties: | | The concept of unalienable rights in America extends as far back as 1620, when the first Pilgrims arrived on the shores of what is now [[Massachusetts]], in search of religious freedom. According to Governor William Bradford, it was the unending attack on the rights of religious minorities in [[Britain]] which convinced the [[Pilgrims]] that leaving [[England]] was the only way to secure their liberties: |
| Line 179: |
Line 162: |
| | * The War on Drugs - Asset Forfeiture Laws (permit the government to deprive someone of their property without due process.) | | * The War on Drugs - Asset Forfeiture Laws (permit the government to deprive someone of their property without due process.) |
| | * U.S. Supreme Court ''Kelo'' decision - Distortion of the power of eminent domain, allowing the government to take land which belongs to one private person or group, and give it to another. | | * U.S. Supreme Court ''Kelo'' decision - Distortion of the power of eminent domain, allowing the government to take land which belongs to one private person or group, and give it to another. |
| − |
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |