Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
366 bytes added ,  02:17, March 19, 2008
Nobody's done it yet?
Line 10: Line 10:     
Why is the whole of the "Creationary view" section taken up with creationist critiques of the dinosaur-to-bird hypothesis rather than positive evidence for the "creationary" version of the origin of birds? [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 13:08, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
 
Why is the whole of the "Creationary view" section taken up with creationist critiques of the dinosaur-to-bird hypothesis rather than positive evidence for the "creationary" version of the origin of birds? [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 13:08, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
: Probably because nobody's yet written that part.  Are you offering?  Actually, I think the section is a bit inaccurate in that perhaps only the first quote is to do with dinosaur-to-bird evolution, and the other two are to do with bird evolution regardless of whether it was from dinosaurs.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:17, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
    
==I'm sorry, but...==
 
==I'm sorry, but...==
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu