Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 395: Line 395:  
== Comments ==
 
== Comments ==
   −
6. Instead you allow the opinions of editor stated as they are facts. Especially if that editor is and admin, or somebody important for Conservapedia. Example: "The result is a huge silo of recorded trivia, and perhaps the world's largest, most distributed bureaucracy - mostly manned '''by a casual staff of teenagers and the unemployed.'''" - [[Wikipedia]]
+
6. Instead you allow the opinions of editors stated as they are facts. Especially if that editor is and admin, or somebody important for Conservapedia. Example: "The result is a huge silo of recorded trivia, and perhaps the world's largest, most distributed bureaucracy - mostly manned '''by a casual staff of teenagers and the unemployed.'''" - [[Wikipedia]]
 
<br>I'm not saying it's not true, it might be, as well as it might also be for Conservapedia, but where is he research that demonstrates that?
 
<br>I'm not saying it's not true, it might be, as well as it might also be for Conservapedia, but where is he research that demonstrates that?
   Line 412: Line 412:     
'''If you have strong arguments against this, don't delete it, but instead state those arguments.'''
 
'''If you have strong arguments against this, don't delete it, but instead state those arguments.'''
−
      
==Suggestion==
 
==Suggestion==
5

edits

Navigation menu