3,101
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 45:
Line 45: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Debate:Bias in conservapedia (view source)
Revision as of 06:26, March 16, 2007
, 06:26, March 16, 2007→Examples of Bias in Conservapedia
::These are from a single user, I take it. Maybe if each is addressed we can move on. [[User:Menkatron|Menkatron]] 16:56, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
::These are from a single user, I take it. Maybe if each is addressed we can move on. [[User:Menkatron|Menkatron]] 16:56, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
:::Yes, they are all by me, and believe me, if you address each one, I will have another 30 ready for you. Fix those? Another 60. Etc. Talk page next time please. --[[User:ALFa|ALFa]] 01:43, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
:::Yes, they are all by me, and believe me, if you address each one, I will have another 30 ready for you. Fix those? Another 60. Etc. Talk page next time please. --[[User:ALFa|ALFa]] 01:43, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
::::Let me answer a couple of these.
1. For centuries textbooks in America have used B.C./ A.D. Common Era means nothing to many Americans, conservatives especially.
2. We give credit to verifiable sources, we differ from Wikipedia because we allow the Bible as a source. This is not evil. If you see something falsely attributed to America, you can and are encouraged to fix it.
3. Examples of Bias shows why we exist and what is broken. Wikipedia has a liberal bias, and does not have all sides of the picture. Circumcision is controlled by a group who delete criticism, if i added a study disproving evolution it would be removed.
4. Just because one is a scientist does not make one infallible. Conservapedia allows properly sourced perspectives. At least we admit our bias.
5. Wikipedia selectively removes facts. Facts are facts, why remove them?
6. An encyclopedia is expected to be educational, not a compendium of garbage.
7. I want to know which pages you are referring to. Pages are protected only to prevent or stop vandalism.
8. No one has added properly cited info on evolution, because most of the users are creationists.
i will answer the others later.
[[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 02:26, 16 March 2007 (EDT)