Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:     
* It is a true perversion of the [[scientific process]] to find that [[skepticism]] is no longer welcome or accepted in [[scientific debate]]. [http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/07/chapter-2-is-it.html]
 
* It is a true perversion of the [[scientific process]] to find that [[skepticism]] is no longer welcome or accepted in [[scientific debate]]. [http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/07/chapter-2-is-it.html]
−
* Many modern [[AGW]] supporters believe that insinuating possible sources of bias is sufficient to exempt one from having to actually critique their opponents’ methods and findings. [''ibid'']
+
* Many modern [[AGW hypothesis|AGW]] supporters believe that insinuating possible sources of bias is sufficient to exempt one from having to actually critique their opponents’ methods and findings. [''ibid'']
    
The two best known cases in the [[history of science]] concern the church's suppression of [[Galileo]], whose findings were finally accepted by the Roman Catholic Church centuries later; and  the [[Lysenko]] episode in the Soviet Union. The current top controversies are [[global warming]] and the [[theory of evolution]].  
 
The two best known cases in the [[history of science]] concern the church's suppression of [[Galileo]], whose findings were finally accepted by the Roman Catholic Church centuries later; and  the [[Lysenko]] episode in the Soviet Union. The current top controversies are [[global warming]] and the [[theory of evolution]].  
5,190

edits

Navigation menu