2,002
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 789:
Line 789: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 11:09, March 16, 2007
, 11:09, March 16, 2007→Figured you'd find this interesting
P.S- For the sake of disclosure, I am the chairman of the town Democratic committee in Merrimack, New Hampshire. Even if I don't agree with you (which seems likely), I will try my best to listen because civil, open and honest debate and deliberation is necessary for a healthy democracy, something we have been losing as a society. [[User:Karmafist|Karmafist]] 04:37, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
P.S- For the sake of disclosure, I am the chairman of the town Democratic committee in Merrimack, New Hampshire. Even if I don't agree with you (which seems likely), I will try my best to listen because civil, open and honest debate and deliberation is necessary for a healthy democracy, something we have been losing as a society. [[User:Karmafist|Karmafist]] 04:37, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
: Why would anybody want to block you? For your study into the political perspectives of Wikipedians? If you take a look at your site you see that it contains of results for a selfselected group of about 20 Wikipedians who bother to take the test that you offered. The fact that the test might be respectable, doesn't change much. To turn this into a respectable study you need about 100 times as many respndents, and you need to know some basic hard facts about the 3.8 million wikipedians. Like where they live, how old old they are, their sex, and correlation between thee. Then you have to weigh your results for these demographic factors. Your study has a long way to go. --[[User:Order|Order]] 16 March, 10:10 (AEST)