Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + + + +
the liberal media's compulsion to always present an alternative perspective to conservative successes, even when it looks ridiculous doing so
'''Bruce Bartlett'''<ref>Mr. Bartlett ... was a domestic policy aide at the [[White House]] in the [[Reagan administration]] and a deputy assistant [[Treasury secretary]] under the first [[President Bush (41)]] [http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/18/politics/18bartlett.html (NY Times, October 18, 2005)</ref>
'''Bruce Bartlett'''<ref>Mr. Bartlett ... was a domestic policy aide at the [[White House]] in the [[Reagan administration]] and a deputy assistant [[Treasury secretary]] under the first [[President Bush (41)]] [http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/18/politics/18bartlett.html (NY Times, October 18, 2005)</ref> is a conserevative author.
He commented:
{{quotebox|One of the amusing things about the [[liberal media]] is its compulsion to always present an alternative perspective to conservative successes, even when it looks ridiculous doing so. Only liberal successes are allowed to be presented without some reporter saying, “On the other hand….” Thus, reports of Ronald Reagan’s accomplishments are always accompanied by boilerplate about his alleged failures, whether it was his inability to cure AIDS, the Iran-Contra scandal, or something else. [http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_bartlett/bartlett200406140846.asp]}}
==Notes==
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}