Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
126 bytes added ,  14:58, March 24, 2008
no edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:  
:It all depends on how you define terrorist.  If I remember the movie correctly, they only attack military targets, so I would say no.  The only thing they do that is possibly a war crime is kill a POW, and that's understandable under the circumstances.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 18:59, 22 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:It all depends on how you define terrorist.  If I remember the movie correctly, they only attack military targets, so I would say no.  The only thing they do that is possibly a war crime is kill a POW, and that's understandable under the circumstances.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 18:59, 22 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:Whoops, I forgot the bombing of the "Soviet-American Friendship Center".  That does come closer to the line, but personnally, I wouldn't call it a terrorist act.  It's not exactly a military target, but the only people that would be in a place like that are Soviets and collaborators.  And bombing it had a direct effect on the occupation.  It's not like bombing a marketplace just to prove you can.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 23:17, 22 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:Whoops, I forgot the bombing of the "Soviet-American Friendship Center".  That does come closer to the line, but personnally, I wouldn't call it a terrorist act.  It's not exactly a military target, but the only people that would be in a place like that are Soviets and collaborators.  And bombing it had a direct effect on the occupation.  It's not like bombing a marketplace just to prove you can.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 23:17, 22 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
::It goes to show how thin the line can be between terrorist and defender.[[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 10:58, 24 March 2008 (EDT)
997

edits

Navigation menu