Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
reply
Line 65: Line 65:  
:Even if 25% of philosophy professors were theists, wouldn't this still be lower than the rate of theism in the population as a whole? I do agree with your post in that it should be examined by specific departments. At least at my school, some departments, such as Economics and Geography, do not seem particularly liberal, while a number of others clearly are. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:03, 24 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:Even if 25% of philosophy professors were theists, wouldn't this still be lower than the rate of theism in the population as a whole? I do agree with your post in that it should be examined by specific departments. At least at my school, some departments, such as Economics and Geography, do not seem particularly liberal, while a number of others clearly are. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:03, 24 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:::DanH, thank you for your polite and kind reply.  I do think that liberal ideology and liberals are over represented in academia.  However, to call something a "professor value" or "male value" while a significant  portion of the population in question does not share a particular value would be over reaching in my estimation. And I do think, for example, that 25% of a given population not sharing a value would be a significant amount of people and be justification for saying a given characteristic was not a value of the population as a whole.  However, you can fairly say that a certain value is over represented in a population as a whole if in fact it is.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:14, 24 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:::DanH, thank you for your polite and kind reply.  I do think that liberal ideology and liberals are over represented in academia.  However, to call something a "professor value" or "male value" while a significant  portion of the population in question does not share a particular value would be over reaching in my estimation. And I do think, for example, that 25% of a given population not sharing a value would be a significant amount of people and be justification for saying a given characteristic was not a value of the population as a whole.  However, you can fairly say that a certain value is over represented in a population as a whole if in fact it is.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:14, 24 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::: Good cites, Conservative.  I've added them.  This entry is ranked #1 on Google and is emerging as a significant insight.  Professors share a common value system, not unanimously, but in higher percentages of agreement than even some churches.  It's enlightening to described the [[professor value]]s and note the harm caused by them.  Ideas obviously do have consequences.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:38, 24 March 2008 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,570

edits

Navigation menu