nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 71:
Line 71: + +
→Suicide is not a crime: Being constructive, Commandment 3
:: It would be just as dishonest to call [[Soccer|Women's Soccer]] a crime just becuase it's illegal in [[Iran]] and a handful of other obscure countries. Failing to mention the whole truth is also a form of lying. [[User:Harebrained|Harebrained]] 08:10, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
:: It would be just as dishonest to call [[Soccer|Women's Soccer]] a crime just becuase it's illegal in [[Iran]] and a handful of other obscure countries. Failing to mention the whole truth is also a form of lying. [[User:Harebrained|Harebrained]] 08:10, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
::: I asked if you can supply evidence that it "is not against the law in the VAST majority of countries in the world". How about trying to be constructive by answering that instead of continuing to criticise when I've already said that it could be altered to be clearer? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:28, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
: By the way, [[User:Harebrained|Harebrained]], you need a remedial lesson in not taking God's name in vain. (I meant to post this last night, but I got caught by the night-time editing restrictions.) Fortunately, an admin cleared that up for you, but I'd suggest following the First Commandment around here. --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] 11:34, 23 March 2008 (EDT)
: By the way, [[User:Harebrained|Harebrained]], you need a remedial lesson in not taking God's name in vain. (I meant to post this last night, but I got caught by the night-time editing restrictions.) Fortunately, an admin cleared that up for you, but I'd suggest following the First Commandment around here. --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] 11:34, 23 March 2008 (EDT)
::What are you on about? The [[Conservapedia:Commandments|First Commandment]] states "Everything you post must be true and verifiable. Do not copy from Wikipedia or elsewhere unless it was your original work." It mentions nothing about using the expression "for Christ's sake". Neither do any of the other commandments. In fact, I could not find a rule in Conservapedia that forbids this. Besides, "for Christ's sake" is just a figure of speech in this context, and altough it has a Christian origin I did not use it in a religious context here, so i don't see why it's offensive to you. The English language is teeming with figures of speech of a biblical origin. [[User:Harebrained|Harebrained]] 08:10, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
::What are you on about? The [[Conservapedia:Commandments|First Commandment]] states "Everything you post must be true and verifiable. Do not copy from Wikipedia or elsewhere unless it was your original work." It mentions nothing about using the expression "for Christ's sake". Neither do any of the other commandments. In fact, I could not find a rule in Conservapedia that forbids this. Besides, "for Christ's sake" is just a figure of speech in this context, and altough it has a Christian origin I did not use it in a religious context here, so i don't see why it's offensive to you. The English language is teeming with figures of speech of a biblical origin. [[User:Harebrained|Harebrained]] 08:10, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
::: Try Conservapedia commandment 3. It's trivialising Christ to use it that way. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:28, 25 March 2008 (EDT)