Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
12 bytes removed ,  21:34, March 25, 2008
no edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:  
The redshift in atomic spectra of distance cosmic objects is claimed as a source of evidence for the [[Big Bang theory]].<ref>Edwin Hubble (1929). [http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/15/3/168/ "A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae"]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 15: 168–173.</ref> The redshift, the expanded wavelength of light, suggests that these objects are moving away from Earth due to the expansion of the universe. This is a phenomenon predicted by the Big Bang theory.  However, creationist cosmologies also predict this expansion, so the evidence cannot be used in support of the Big Bang theory over creationist theories.
 
The redshift in atomic spectra of distance cosmic objects is claimed as a source of evidence for the [[Big Bang theory]].<ref>Edwin Hubble (1929). [http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/15/3/168/ "A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae"]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 15: 168–173.</ref> The redshift, the expanded wavelength of light, suggests that these objects are moving away from Earth due to the expansion of the universe. This is a phenomenon predicted by the Big Bang theory.  However, creationist cosmologies also predict this expansion, so the evidence cannot be used in support of the Big Bang theory over creationist theories.
   −
== Notes and References ==
+
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
[[Category:Astronomy]]
 
[[Category:Astronomy]]
8,728

edits

Navigation menu