nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 62:
Line 62: + + + +
Removal of quotes
Sorry for the misstatemet Philip. I meant to say "that is a coincidence." forgive me. I also meant to ask if you'd read Stark, not Kuhn, but I do commend Kuhn to your attention.-[[User:PhoenixWright|PhoenixWright]] 11:14, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
Sorry for the misstatemet Philip. I meant to say "that is a coincidence." forgive me. I also meant to ask if you'd read Stark, not Kuhn, but I do commend Kuhn to your attention.-[[User:PhoenixWright|PhoenixWright]] 11:14, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
== Removal of quotes ==
TheGySom removed a couple of quotes with the edit comment ''Since articles are not collections of quotes, a start'', and I agree that articles should be more than a collection of quotes. However, in doing so, he's removed the points that the quotes were making. This I ''don't'' agree with. Further, the replacement "basis of science" section is talking about its ''principles'', not the ''basis'' for it. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:00, 25 March 2008 (EDT)