Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 112: Line 112:  
Should abuse by priests in catholic schools deserve its own article entitles, [[Priest Values]]? Of course not, because the abuse committed by some priests is not indicative of the entire group. [[User:LeaningRight|LeaningRight]] 20:42, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
 
Should abuse by priests in catholic schools deserve its own article entitles, [[Priest Values]]? Of course not, because the abuse committed by some priests is not indicative of the entire group. [[User:LeaningRight|LeaningRight]] 20:42, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:You're making a big mistake, you think this "encyclopedia" <!-- blog --> is governed by logic and reason, it isn't. -- '''[[user:DLerner|<font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms">D L e r n e r</font>]]''' <sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DLerner Articulate] </sup> 20:48, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:You're making a big mistake, you think this "encyclopedia" <!-- blog --> is governed by logic and reason, it isn't. -- '''[[user:DLerner|<font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms">D L e r n e r</font>]]''' <sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DLerner Articulate] </sup> 20:48, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: DLerner was blocked for his repeated derogatory comments, and "LeaningRight" you should be blocked for your 90/10 [[rule]] violation against talk, talk, talk.
 +
 +
:: This [[professor values]] lists the commonly held values and consequences of those values.  Your suggestion does not fit that model, and is ludicrous.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:17, 26 March 2008 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,331

edits

Navigation menu